This research was carried out with THE purpose of determining THE effectiveness of THE self-KNOWLEDGE educational package based on THE THEory of existentialism on THE illogical beliefs of communication on PEOPLE. THE statistical population included all married PEOPLE who referred to counseling and psychological centers in Tehran's 1st and 3rd districts with marital problems. In THE current research, experimental research method of quasi-experimental type of pre-test and post-test design with control group was used. In THE research sample, 16 PEOPLE who had a high level of irrational beliefs were selected voluntarily based on THE answers to THE voluntary questionnaire of counseling centers, and 8 PEOPLE were randomly replaced in THE experimental and control groups. THE data collection tool was Adilson and Epstein's communication irrational beliefs questionnaire, which was conducted with a pre-test and post-test design with a control group and 12 data collection training sessions. Multivariate analysis of covariance or MANOVA method was used for data analysis. THE results of THE analysis of covariance in THE Mankva text showed that in THE main hypoTHEsis, THE analysis of covariance in THE variable of couples' irrational beliefs (sig=0.02, F=6.059) is significant. THE results of THE sub-hypoTHEses also showed that THE analysis of covariance in THE variable of destructiveness, belief in THE changeability of THE spouse, belief in mind reading, belief in sexual perfectionism and sexual differences of couples is significant. THE self-KNOWLEDGE education based on THE existentialism approach is effective on THE irrational beliefs of married PEOPLE.

In order to determine THE role of THE US withdrawal from Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) in 2018 in THE evolution and change of THE poverty framing, this study analyzes how poverty is framed in two categories of specialized (including leadership, Dolat, Mizan, Icana) and general websites (including Fars, Moj and Young Journalists Club) during 2017, 2018 and 2019. For this, it uses Framing as a THEory, and THE technique of Pan and Kosicki’s Frame analysis as a research method. Findings are categorized in four groups as syntactical, script, THEmatic, and rhetorical. THE review indicates that 42,302 news and reports are distributed in THEse websites in THE research period that 275 were identified as samples and recorded and analyzed in Maxquda software. THE results show that, except for THE Young Journalists Club, THE way poverty is framed has changed on all cases since THE imposition of sanctions, and sanctions highlighted as one of THE main causes of poverty in THE framing of poverty. In regard of agenda setting, THE coverage of poverty news and reports is less than 10%; THE poverty news coverage has been declining over THE three years under study. THE websites of Leadership and Moj have THE largest coverage, and Young Journalists Club has THE least amount (less than 1%) of coverage. Due to his type of agenda setting, THE problem of poverty is marginalized in public opinion. THE framing of poverty with emphasis on THE US withdrawal from JCPA as THE cause of poverty represent poverty as a temporary issue, silences THE voice of THE poor, and depicts THE emergence of a new social form in Iranian society.

Scientific scepticism, fundamentally, questions THE veracity and epistemic value of claims not supported by scientific evidence. Motivated by THE assumption that only THE empirical investigation of reality leads to THE truth, THE scientific sceptics often maintain that only scientific method is best suited for this purpose. Claims found to be wanting in scientific evidence are considered untrue, and of little or no epistemic consequence. Using THE analytical and critical methods, this paper interrogates this epistemic criterion of justification of scientific scepticism. It shows THE inherent epistemic deficits in this criterion of THE scientific sceptics, and how absolutizing its demands in such a manner as to undermine THE veracity and epistemic significance of claims outside THE mainstream discipline of science is not only to entrap THEmselves in many epistemic burdens, but also to sink under THE unsavoury weight of criteriological egocentrism, detrimental to cognitive progress. As a credible alternative, this paper explores THE epistemic fecundity of contextualistic pluralism – THE pluralism of contextually underwritten cognitive positions – in truth and KNOWLEDGE justification. It concludes with THE relevance of this approach in epistemic justification as evident in its inclusive nature as well as its shift of THE focus of philosophical thinking from identity to diversity in an interculturality society.

THE focus of this study is primarily on “THE discrepancy in mentality as an important factor affecting family problems and divorce”. For this purpose, some minor studies were conducted each of which experimentally examined different aspects of mental discrepancy in Iranian families. Almost all of THEse studies showed that permanent disputes and divorces resulted from THE differences in THEir world-views, thinkings, and impressions in THEir mutual affairs. At last, THE THEory of Homogamy with two major revisions were used to explain THE reasons and causes of family problems and divorce which were confirmed in minor studies and cases.

THE Prophet's succession was THE most important issue in THE history of Islam at THE beginning of Islam, which overshadowed all subsequent events. Each of THE companions who found THEmselves worthy of THE caliphate sought to assume THE office of THE caliphate. A group sought to achieve this goal from THE very beginning, but THE oTHEr group, which failed to achieve this goal at THE beginning, was with THE winner trying to gain a strong record to hold it in THE following periods. Among THEse PEOPLE was Abd al-Rahman bin Auf, who after THE death of THE Prophet He did not participate in THE disputes between companions to gain power and only took THE side of THE victorious person in THE field, namely Sheikhin, During THE era of Abu Bakr and especially Umar, he gave advice and fatwas on important government matters, that is why Umar entrusted him with THE right to appoint THE next caliph in case of a tie in THE Shura. Abdur Rahman also sought help from this to achieve his goals. By setting THE condition of following THE way of Sheikhin, which followed THE election of Uthman; He is waiting for THE caliphate after him. That's why he started to act as a secretary, which he was not known for before. because he wanted to show that he is worthy of THE caliphate; But contrary to his idea, Uthman sided with Bani Umayyah. After that, he regretted what he had done and wanted to rise against Uthman, but no one accompanied him.

How to profoundly change THE beliefs of THE polyTHEists during THE age of revelation from THE denial of THE Prophet (pbuh) to THE certainty of his Message and THE acceptance of his full guardianship is a question worthy of attention. THE order of verses about prophecy based on THE order of revelation is THE reason to lead a transformative process and a special Quranic method in institutionalizing THE belief of prophecy in THE lives of Arabs. In THE first stage, THE Holy Quran in THE first Makkī (Arabic: المکّیّ, suras revealed in Mecca) chapters has prepared THE community from THE motivational side to accept THE truth of THE Prophet’s (pbuh) prophecy and briefly stating THE key issues surrounding it. THE Holy Book of Quran at THE time of THE emergence of oppositions and doubts (THE second stage) destroyed THE arguments of THE polyTHEists and explained THE prophecy and proved its auTHEnticity from a cognitive perspective in THE second stage by presenting clear arguments. and THE Holy Book of Quran in THE third stage after Madanī (Arabic: المدنیّ, suras revealed in Medina) period has undertaken measures in order to fulfill THE goals of THE Massage by explaining THE true position of THE Prophet (pbuh) to deepen and operationalize THE Prophetic belief through explaining practical duties for THE Prophet (pbuh) and behavior based on THE acceptance of Walaya (Arabic: ولایة, meaning “guardianship” or “governance”).

One of THE most frequent rules in various areas of demonstrative jurisprudence of Two Major Sects of Islam religion is a rule that is known among Shīʿa as “tolerance in THE evidence of traditions” (Arabic: التسامح فی أدلّة السنن) and in Sunnī as “latitudinarianism in documents” (Arabic: التساهل فی أسانید). Believers in THE general application of this rule have based it for reasons such as consensus (Arabic: إجماع), tradition famous through practice (Arabic: الشهرة العملیّة), and rational judgement (intellectual judgement) and a group of aḥādīth (Arabic: أحادیث, plural form for ḥadīth, literally “talk” or “discourse”) called “Akhbar-e- Man Balagh” (Arabic: أخبار من بلغ). THE understanding of THE aforementioned narrations and THE extent of application of this rule has caused a conflict of opinions among scholars. THE narrations containing THE excellences of suras of THE Holy Book of Quran is one of THE fields of application of THE rule of tolerance. THE present research has explained THE types of exposure to this group of narrations based on THE rule of tolerance by using descriptive-exploratory method and using library sources and seeks to find a suitable approach about narrations of THE excellences of suras (chapters) of THE Holy Book of Quran. THE interaction with THEse narrations is organized based on a special reading of THE rule of tolerance in THE selected approach, which is based on a rational interpretation of THE contents of Man-Balagh (Arabic: من بلغ)’s narrations and is compatible with THE indications of some verses and traditions. THE use of weak narrations containing THE excellences of suras (chapters) will be permissible based on this approach considering three conditions and without any certainty of attributing THEse narrations to Sharʿ (Islamic rules).

Purpose: THE present research aimed at finding an answer to THE question of THE process of influence of cyberspace on Iranian Poetry in THE future, and THE influence of cyberspace on various aspects of poetry such as content, its audience, THE poet, THE media that published THE poem, THE process of composing THE poem, THE rights of THE author, and Globalization of THE Iranian poetry. Method: THE Delphi technique was used to carry out this research. A group of experts comprising professors in THE fields of Communication and Literature was selected. THE expert’s opinions were collected and analyzed through an in-depth interview, a questionnaire based on THE Likert scale, and by THE execution of three stages of Delphi rounds. Findings: Accordingly, considering THE content, THE experts predicted that due to THE impact of cyberspace, THE quality of THE poetry will be reduced and consequently, THE language of poetry will become simpler and close to prose and it will only reflect THE daily events of life. Regarding THE audience, THEy concluded that THE audience’s selection power will be increased, however, we can differentiate between THE public and professional audience. With respect to THE sender, THEre will be no phenomenon of multi authors, and regarding THE channel, THE experts agreed upon Media Convergence besides, THE poets’ agency in publishing THEir own poems will be increased. Conclusion: Experts believe that THE spread of communication technologies will make censorship ineffective. This is THE only case in which THE group believes in THE impact of technology on THE future of poetry. THE group of experts did not reach a consensus regarding THE impact of technology on THE phenomena such as publication of author’s poems as one’s original work and THE Globalization of Iranian poetry, thus, analyzed THEse items in THE framework of THE human agency.